In Google we (dis)trust
Ashley Gold and Margaret Harding McGill for Axios: DC’s assault on tech will crest at CEO hearing. Big Tech CEOs testify before US House subcommittee on Monday; lawmakers will grill them on antitrust and market dominance, misinformation and content moderation, China, and data privacy.
Jeffrey A Trachtenberg for Wall Street Journal: WSJ journalists ask publisher for clearer distinction between news and opinion content. “The letter cites several examples of concern, including a recent essay by Vice President Mike Pence about coronavirus infections. The letter’s authors said [it was published] ‘without checking government figures’ and noted that the piece […] was later corrected.”
Nicholson Baker for Columbia Journalism Review: Youtube’s psychic wounds. “Seeking political news, Nicholson Baker ventures to the wrong clip and back again.” “This endless, crowd-curated theatre of ourselves, serves up the raw, the cooked, the failing, the helpful, and the WTF? any time you want it.”
Statistically speaking…
Because this week’s essay is much longer than usual, I have to redirect you to a separate post, and I hope you will find it insightful as I share about:
how data and statistics are interpreted and reported
basic fractions and unintentionally diluting homemade hand sanitisers
the importance of proportional representation
why some things are not to scale
why COVID-19 studies get published rapidly, and some retracted just as quickly
What I read, watch and listen to…
I’m reading the Indigenous Protocol and Artificial Intelligence position paper.
Otherwise, I’m reading BBC Mews. Because the Internet is made of cats.
I’m watching Broey Deschanel’s analysis of, in her words, “everyone's favourite smol bean, and his flaws,” Wes Anderson:
Chart of the week
Head of Client Solutions and Analytics of Google UK Biren Kalaria wrote The story of UK lockdown through Google Trends. An interesting set of stats showing how people feel (“lower back pain”), what people know (“the quietest time to go shopping”), how people make a living (“what does furlough mean”), how people learn (“interior angles of a pentagon”), and what people do (“espresso martini”).
Orang muda dan Bahasa Melayu dalam media sosial – sebuah rumusan
Menurut Prof Dato’ Dr Teo Kok Seong dalam Wacana Ilmu bertajuk Orang Muda dan Bahasa Melayu dalam Media Sosial, siaran dalam media sosial “ yang ditulis dalam bahasa Melayu telah banyak mengubah sifat bahasa Melayu itu sendiri,” dan pelbagai gelaran diberikan bahasa Melayu dalam media sosial ini termasuklah:
bahasa Melayu semu – berbentuk seakan-akan bahasa Melayu, tetapi bukan bahasa Melayu yang sebenar
bahasa Melayu baharu – kerana bahasa Melayu yang digunakan dalam media sosial memiliki ciri-ciri baharu
suatu kelainan bahasa Melayu – seperti dialek bahasa Melayu yang lain
Asasnya, penggunaan bahasa Melayu dalam media sosial mempunyai ciri-ciri berbentuk jelek, seperti:
Tidak ada usaha penyuntingan, penyemakan dan pemantauan untuk memastikan ia mengikuti dan mematuhi amalan berbahasa yang lazim. Contoh ketara adalah penggunaan trengkas (shorthand), iaitu penggunaan singkatan seperti pu3 yang bermaksud puteri, iaitu 3 itu dibaca dalam bahasa Inggeris.
Satu faktor penting adalah persadanya, yang mempengaruhi penggunaan bahasa. Sebagai contoh, Twitter menghadkan ruangan huruf teks, maka kecendurang menggunakan trengkas adalah lebih tinggi.
Kosa kata yang sedia ada diberi makna baru yang fahamannya terhad kepada pengguna media sosial sahaja, iaitu berbentuk slanga. Contohnya, ciap(an), yang makna asalnya merujuk kepada bunyi anak ayam, diberi makna lain untuk merujuk kepada apa-apa yang dikongsi di dalam Twitter.
Kosa kata itu menjadi jelek apabila dipinjam terus dari bahasa Inggeris tanpa ada terjemahan langsung. Contohnya, otw dan lol membentuk bahasa rojak yang tidak pernah menjadi serapan kepada bahasa Melayu.
Bahasa jelek ini “tertumpah” ke dalam cara berbahasa orang kebanyakan sama ada secara lisan atau tulisan. Jalan tengah yang dicadangkannya dalam permasalahan ini adalah untuk “mengambil kira lingkungan penggunaan sebagai landasan” dan “menggunakan laras yang betul berdasarkan ranahnya.” Tambahnya:
Kita perlu dan wajib menggunakan bahasa yang baik dan betul dalam ranah formal kerana ia adalah bidang rasmi yang serius, maka bahasa yang digunakan itu perlu berperaturan. Manakala dalam ranah yang tidak formal, atas dasar kebebasan linguistik, kita boleh menggunakan bahasa yang tidak formal ini, yakni yang tidak sangat mengikuti peraturan.
Transcript for audio
Last week, I had to take a health exam. I spent about four hours at the medical centre, but nothing exciting happened. Except… I was wearing a mask and had my hair in a top knot bun, and the receptionist asked if she should address me as miss or mister. I was slightly taken aback – “miss, please,” I said. I wasn’t offended, but I thought it was too unconventionally progressive for Malaysia.
Then, the nurse had trouble drawing my blood. It took a while and I held in my pee for too long that I had to go before I was asked to pee in the cup, so I had to wait until the end of all the other tests to try to pee in the cup – which I did, successfully, although I was quite close to having to empty my bladder again before the nurses called me for a pee.
I had my physical tests done for practically everything – HIV, syphilis, hepatitis, TB, psychological disorders... I was concerned about my resting heart rate, which is normally above 90, but I managed to get it to as low as a 76 or 78. Maybe it was from the drawing of the blood. I hope my friend Dr Guna is happy with that. I learned several days before my medical exam that he has an internal metronome. I thought it was the coolest party trick ever – he placed a thumb to my wrist and within two or three seconds he guesstimated my heart rate. I glanced quickly at my smartwatch to confirm it myself. Decades practising as a clinician, I’m sure, comes with many other fine skills, but this one was particularly impressive.
I received most of the results during the final checkpoint, which was the consultation with the physician. She couldn’t really consult me about anything, seeing that I was in good health (if I do say so myself) but she afforded her time anyway, and we discussed my concerns about my cholesterol levels, which I sometimes fail to manage properly. It’s genetics. She said not to worry. Then we ran out of things to talk about, but it would be too soon to send me out the door, so she suddenly asked me, as though we were pals, if she could ask me about something. “Do you like your watch?” she asked, without looking up from my medical report she had in front of her. I didn’t even realise she noticed it. We talked about some of the functions of my watch, but I couldn’t tell if she bought into it.
I was then sent my merry way and told to wait about a week for the rest of the blood test results to be emailed to me. There shouldn’t be a problem, they said, as a nurse cut off my pink hospital wristband. I was worried that I had to walk out with it on, since the colour code is the same as the COVID-19 quarantine tag.
Share this post